June 9, 2025 | 12:54 PM PKT

I’m sitting here with a cup of tea, mulling over the latest tension between India and Pakistan. The Shimla Deal, their peace pact from 1972, is suddenly under a spotlight. With sharp words and bold moves lately, I’m not sure if this is a real crack in the foundation or just another loud argument. Let’s dig into it.

Shimla Deal Shaken by Recent Moves

It all started heating up after a deadly attack in Pahalgam, Jammu and Kashmir, back on April 22, 2025, where 26 lives were lost. India struck back on May 7, hitting targets across the border in Pakistan. That sparked Pakistan to halt the Indus Waters agreement last month, and now they’re tossing around the idea of scrapping the Shimla Deal too. I’m wondering— is this a genuine break, or just a knee-jerk response to India’s actions?

India’s Steady Hand on the Shimla Deal

On June 5, Pakistan’s Defence Minister Khawaja Asif dropped a bombshell, calling the Shimla Deal “done for” and suggesting the Line of Control (LoC) should revert to some old boundary line. That got me thinking could this be a game-changer? But then, on June 6, their foreign office stepped in, saying no final decision been made. I’m scratching my head here. Did Asif jump the gun, or is Pakistan testing India’s reaction? It feels like a tug-of-war with no clear winner.

India’s been quiet about all this, which catches my eye. They’ve clung to the Shimla Deal’s focus on solving things face-to-face, and Russia threw its weight behind that idea on May 4. I’m picturing Delhi playing it cool—maybe they’re confident, or maybe they’re waiting to see if Pakistan follows through. No big statement from India makes me doubt the threat’s seriousness. Are they holding their cards close, or just not sweating it?

Shimla Deal’s Worn-Out History

This pact isn’t new to trouble. Born after India’s 1971 triumph, it drew the LoC and promised calm, but it’s been stretched thin over time. Think of the 1999 Kargil clash or India’s 2019 Article 370 shift—both tested its limits. Folks on X are buzzing, with some in India dreaming of grabbing more land if it falls, though that’s just chatter for now. I’m cautious—both sides have danced around this deal before, so what’s different this time?

Shimla Deal’s Uncertain Future

What’s next? A US-brokered truce on May 10 stopped a 87-hour skirmish, but the air’s still thick with tension. If Pakistan pulls the plug, it might drag the LoC fight to the global stage, which India won’t like. I’m not sold on Pakistan going all in—their economy’s shaky, and a split could hurt them more. India’s silence might be strength or a wait-and-see game. I’m watching the LoC—any new trouble could tip the scales.

My View on the Shimla Deal Mess

As I wrap this up, I’m leaning toward this being more bluster than action. The Shimla Deal has weathered storms before, and Asif’s outburst, followed by the retreat, smells like politics to me. India’s calm could be a smart move, but I doubt either side wants a full break—too much at stake. Still, with past flare-ups in mind, I wouldn’t rule out another spark. What do you think—can this deal hold steady, or are we on the brink of something new?